P R O

THIS WEEK'S PRO PLAYOFF GAMES
Last Week's Pro
Games
The ridiculous results of the past two
weeks have completely disrupted our ratings.
The forecasts presented here are largely taking into account last weeks games.
Many of those games involved backup personnel and minimal effort. Sorry about that.
The ratings for Indianapolis, New Orleans, Cincinnati, Arizona, etc. are too low.
We have no real solution for this annual NFL problem.
| Saturday, January 9, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
| MST | TV | Favorite & Rating | Spr. | Underdog & Rating | Score | +/- | ||||||||
| 2:30p | NBC | New York Jets | 141 | 4 | Cincinnati Bengals* | 134 | 24-14 | + | ||||||
| 6:00p | NBC | Dallas Cowboys* | 142 | 5 | Philadelphia Eagles | 140 | 34-14 | + | ||||||
| Sunday, January 10, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
| MST | TV | Favorite & Rating | Spr. | Underdog & Rating | Score | +/- | ||||||||
| 11:00a | CBS | New England Patriots* | 141 | 4 | Baltimore Ravens | 140 | 14-33 | - | ||||||
| 2:30p | FOX | Green Bay Packers | 143 | 5 | Arizona Cardinals* | 135 | 45-51 | - | ||||||
|
||||||||||||||
PRO RANKINGS
As of Monday, January 4, 2010
| The Pigskin Index Top 32 Pro Teams | |||||
| Rank | Team | Rating | Rank | Team | Rating |
| 1 | Green Bay (11-5) | 143 | 17 | Arizona (10-6) | 135 |
| 2 | San Diego (13-3) | 143 | 18 | Buffalo (6-10) | 135 |
| 3 | Dallas (11-5) | 142 | 19 | Cincinnati (10-6) | 134 |
| 4 | Carolina (8-8) | 141 | 20 | N.Y. Giants (8-8) | 134 |
| 5 | New England (10-6) | 141 | 21 | Miami (7-9) | 134 |
| 6 | N.Y. Jets (9-7) | 141 | 22 | Chicago (7-9) | 133 |
| 7 | Baltimore (9-7) | 140 | 23 | Tampa Bay (3-13) | 133 |
| 8 | Minnesota (12-4) | 140 | 24 | Denver (8-8) | 133 |
| 9 | Philadelphia (11-5) | 140 | 25 | Washington (4-12) | 132 |
| 10 | New Orleans (13-3) | 140 | 26 | Cleveland (5-11) | 131 |
| 11 | Houston (9-7) | 139 | 27 | Jacksonville (7-9) | 131 |
| 12 | Atlanta (9-7) | 138 | 28 | Kansas City (4-12) | 130 |
| 13 | Indianapolis (14-2) | 138 | 29 | Oakland (5-11) | 130 |
| 14 | Pittsburgh (9-7) | 138 | 30 | Seattle (5-11) | 126 |
| 15 | San Francisco (8-8) | 137 | 31 | St. Louis (1-15) | 124 |
| 16 | Tennessee (8-8) | 136 | 32 | Detroit (2-14) | 123 |
PRO STANDINGS
As of Monday, January 4, 2010
| NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE | |||||||||
| American Football Conference | National Football Conference | ||||||||
| TEAM | W | L | T | PCT | TEAM | W | L | T | PCT |
| AFC EAST | NFC EAST | ||||||||
| New England | 10 | 6 | 0 | .625 | Dallas | 11 | 5 | 0 | .688 |
| NY Jets | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 | Philadelphia | 11 | 5 | 0 | .688 |
| Miami | 7 | 9 | 0 | .438 | NY Giants | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
| Buffalo | 6 | 10 | 0 | .375 | Washington | 4 | 12 | 0 | .250 |
| AFC NORTH | NFC NORTH | ||||||||
| Cincinnati | 10 | 6 | 0 | .625 | Minnesota | 12 | 4 | 0 | .750 |
| Baltimore | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 | Green Bay | 11 | 5 | 0 | .688 |
| Pittsburgh | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 | Chicago | 7 | 9 | 0 | .438 |
| Cleveland | 5 | 11 | 0 | .313 | Detroit | 2 | 14 | 0 | .125 |
| AFC SOUTH | NFC SOUTH | ||||||||
| Indianapolis | 14 | 2 | 0 | .875 | New Orleans | 13 | 3 | 0 | .813 |
| Houston | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 | Atlanta | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 |
| Tennessee | 7 | 8 | 0 | .467 | Carolina | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
| Jacksonville | 7 | 9 | 0 | .438 | Tampa Bay | 3 | 13 | 0 | .188 |
| AFC WEST | NFC WEST | ||||||||
| San Diego | 13 | 3 | 0 | .813 | Arizona | 10 | 6 | 0 | .625 |
| Denver | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 | San Francisco | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
| Oakland | 5 | 11 | 0 | .313 | Seattle | 5 | 10 | 0 | .333 |
| Kansas City | 4 | 12 | 0 | .250 | St. Louis | 1 | 15 | 0 | .063 |
The Pigskin Index is designed to give a quick comparison of the relative strength of all covered teams. To see how a game should turn out, simply compare the ratings of the competing teams and add 3 points to the home team. For example, a visiting team with a rating of 140 should be 7 points stronger than a home team with a rating of 130. 140 - (130 + 3) = 7. In neutral field games (such as the Super Bowl), no home team advantage may be appropriate.
Updated Sunday, January 10, 2010
Contents © 2010 Gary Hawley · Denver, CO
All Rights Reserved
The information at this site is for news and entertainment purposes only.
Use of this information in violation of federal, state, or local laws is prohibited.
PowerRatings.com does not endorse or recommend the services of any advertiser.
The advertiser you select is solely responsible for its services to you, the customer.